⟨ BLOGPLAYBOOKSADVERTISING

The hook library: first three seconds, catalogued

The current video ads in your category reduced to their first three seconds: every hook pattern catalogued, who runs it, and the three hooks worth testing next.

PlaybookAd LibrariesVideo AnalysisCSVRUN BY THE DEMAND GENERATION AGENT →

The problem this solves

The first three seconds decide whether a video ad exists. Feed platforms bill on attention, viewers grant it in fractions of a second, and everything after the hook only matters to the audience the hook kept. Ad teams know this arithmetic, which is why the hook is the most tested element in their creative - and why the hooks running in your category right now are a map of what the market has already paid to learn.

That map is public and almost nobody reads it, because reading it means watching the opening seconds of dozens of ads attentively enough to notice the pattern: what appears first, what is said first, what text lands on screen, whether the product or the problem leads. Done by hand it is an afternoon of squinting at a phone; the notes decay immediately as creatives rotate.

This mission reads the whole map in one pass. It collects the current video ads in your category from the ad libraries, analyzes the first three seconds of each - shown, said, and written, quoted exactly - and builds the catalogue: every hook pattern, who runs it, how common it is, and where the untested openings are.

How the mission runs

  1. Collect the running video ads. The ad libraries supply the current video creatives across your category - competitors and adjacent advertisers - with direct media files. The set is deduplicated so each distinct creative is analyzed once.
  2. Analyze every opening. Each ad's first three seconds get the dense read: a frame burst across the opening, the first spoken words, and every piece of on-screen text exactly as rendered. The hook is treated as its own artifact, separate from the ad behind it.
  3. Classify the patterns. The openings are sorted into named patterns: problem-first, product-in-hand, bold-claim text card, founder-to-camera, before-and-after, price-led. Each pattern carries its examples, so the label always points back at real ads.
  4. Read the distribution. The catalogue shows what dominates and what is absent: which patterns half the category leans on, which appear once, and which plausible hooks nobody is running. Saturation and white space are both findings.
  5. Recommend the three tests. The mission closes with the three hooks worth testing for your brand: grounded in the catalogue, differentiated from the saturated patterns, and written as concrete opening descriptions a creative team can shoot or generate this week.

The prompt

This is the exact objective the agent receives. Swap the obvious placeholders for your own domain, segment or channel and run it as-is from the console, Slack, or the API.

⟨ THE MISSION PROMPT · PASTE AND RUN ⟩

Collect the current video ads in my category from the ad libraries, analyze the first three seconds of each - what is shown, said, and written on screen - and build a hook library: every pattern, who runs it, and the three hooks worth testing for us.

What comes back

A hook library for your category: every current video ad's first three seconds decoded and quoted, the openings classified into named patterns with prevalence and examples, delivered as a CSV catalogue plus a short read on the white space - ending with three concrete hook recommendations ready for testing.

Make it yours

  • Rerun monthly and track pattern drift: hooks rotating out of the category are as informative as the ones arriving.
  • Split the library by platform, since the hooks that survive TikTok pacing differ from the ones that open Facebook feed ads.
  • Chain it with the reference-to-brief playbook: pick the recommended hook, feed its best example through the decode, and walk away with the brief.

Frequently asked questions

Why only the first three seconds?

Because that is the unit the market actually optimizes. Full-ad teardowns exist as their own playbook; this one isolates the single element with the highest tested density and the clearest win condition, and catalogues it at category scale.

What makes this better than watching the ads myself?

Scale and exactness. Forty openings watched attentively is an afternoon, and human notes drift toward impressions. The analysis quotes what is shown, said, and written in each opening verbatim, so the patterns are counted rather than felt.

How are the three recommended hooks chosen?

From the gaps and the fit: patterns underused in your category, compatible with your product's proof and your brand's voice, and different enough from each other to make the test informative. Each comes as a concrete opening description, ready to brief.

Go deeper

⟨ RUN IT INSTEAD OF READING IT ⟩

This mission runs minutes after signup.

Open a workspace, paste the prompt, and the Demand Generation Agent carries it end to end on your plan's monthly credits - evidence attached.

⟨ RELATED PLAYBOOKS ⟩