Job-posting triggers → Attio
Every company that posted a job for "RevOps" or "Marketing Operations" in the last 14 days in the US: pull firmographics, find the VP of Marketing with a verified email, …
Attio gives you a CRM shaped like your business; the agents fill that shape with living data - sourced records, list builds on real signals, and reads that turn the workspace into briefs.
Attio teams tend to care about data model quality - that is why they chose it. The agents respect that: records they stage arrive with sources, enrichment maps to the attributes you actually defined, and list-building missions populate collections with the criteria written down. The flexible model stays coherent because everything entering it carries its reasoning.
And because Attio is often the system of record for fast-moving teams, the read side earns its keep quickly: investor updates, pipeline snapshots and account briefs assemble themselves from the workspace instead of from screenshots and memory.
Collections populated from live criteria - hiring, funding, tech adoption - with each entry carrying the signal that qualified it.
Enrichment lands in the attributes your model defines rather than a notes-field dump.
A company name in, a full brief out: your Attio history on them plus fresh outside research, merged and sourced.
Snapshots for standups and updates read straight from records - counts, movements, and the entries behind each number.
Real missions from the playbook library - run them as-is from the console, or read the full article behind each.
Every company that posted a job for "RevOps" or "Marketing Operations" in the last 14 days in the US: pull firmographics, find the VP of Marketing with a verified email, …
Take my signups using personal email domains, resolve who they actually are and where they work, and write the resolved companies and people into Attio.
Connections are scoped to one workspace, every card has a disconnect button, and outbound actions honor your approval policy.
Missions read your model before writing to it and map enrichment onto the attributes that exist. Anything that does not fit cleanly is reported rather than forced into the wrong field.
Yes - leave external writes gated and simply never approve CRM writes, or tell the mission read-only in the objective. Reporting and research lose nothing in that mode.
Every list build deduplicates against existing records, states its inclusion criteria in the deliverable, and stages additions as a reviewable batch - so the collection stays a decision, never an accident.
One connection, eight specialist agents, one budget ledger - and your approval policy on everything outbound.