For sites that live in a repo, the agents speak the native tongue: fixes arrive as pull requests on new branches, reasoned line by line, merged only by your review.
When marketing infrastructure is code, marketing fixes should be commits. Connected to GitHub, audit missions finish the honest way: the crawler-access corrections, the metadata fixes, the llms.txt - opened as a pull request on a fresh branch with the reasoning attached, entering exactly the review flow your engineers already trust. No ticket translation, no fix lost between teams.
The write discipline is strict by construction: new branches always, default-branch writes refused outright, merges human. The agents propose in code; your review culture disposes.
Technical SEO and access corrections opened as PRs with per-change reasoning.
For repo-based sites, content changes arrive as reviewable diffs like everything else.
Structure and conventions read first, so proposals fit the codebase they land in.
Never the default branch - structurally refused, not merely discouraged.
Real missions from the playbook library - run them as-is from the console, or read the full article behind each.
Audit mysite.com for AI-answer citability - structure, freshness signals, crawler access, llms.txt - then open a pull request with the concrete file fixes and explain eac…
Rework my docs site's top ten pages to be answer-extractable - definitions up front, steps as lists, schema markup - and open the pull request with all changes.
Audit mysite.com for technical SEO issues, then open a pull request that fixes the metadata, structured data and robots problems it found - one commit per fix class, each…
For the open site-fix pull request, verify the Vercel preview actually resolves each audit finding, comment the verification on the PR, and post the ready-to-merge summar…
Connections are scoped to one workspace, every card has a disconnect button, and outbound actions honor your approval policy.
No - default-branch writes are refused at the platform level, not left to prompt manners. Everything arrives as a branch and a PR for human review.
Like a careful colleague’s: scoped changes, a description explaining each edit and its evidence, and no drive-by refactors. The audit that produced the PR is linked from the mission.
Crawler-access and citability audits shipping their fixes, technical SEO corrections, and content operations on repo-based sites - anywhere the finding and the fix can be the same artifact.
One connection, eight specialist agents, one budget ledger - and your approval policy on everything outbound.