COMPETITIVE INTEL
Full teardown → deck → sent
A named rival's positioning, product surface, GTM and momentum, synthesized into a deck for the Friday leadership read.
FirmographicsAd LibrariesHiring DataGammaGmail
ONE MISSION · EVIDENCE ATTACHED
⟨ FOR CYBERSECURITY VENDORS ⟩
Growth for a market that distrusts marketing.
Security buyers punish hype and reward precision. Agents that ground every claim in evidence, watch a fast-moving competitive field, and win the AI answers practitioners actually consult.
PRECISION OVER HYPETHE FIELD WATCHEDPRACTITIONER-GRADE CONTENT
⟨ THE JOB TODAY ⟩
Where the week actually goes.
01 /
Your buyers fact-check everything
Security practitioners read claims adversarially and remember the vendor that overclaimed. Generic AI content is not a shortcut here; it is a credibility incident waiting to publish.
02 /
The category re-forms constantly
Funding waves, consolidation and rebrands redraw the competitive map quarterly. The battlecard from March argues against a company that pivoted in May.
03 /
Evaluations start in AI answers
Practitioners ask assistants to shortlist tooling and explain categories. Those answers cite sources - and the citable sources in security skew toward whoever documented best.
⟨ CATEGORY WATCH ⟩WEEKLY · LIVE
⟨ WITH ASTROFABRIC ⟩
What changes when agents carry the work.
Content precise enough to survive practitioners
Drafts grounded in sources, technical claims flagged for expert review, and a QA gate that blocks the unsupported superlative before it costs you credibility.
sourced → expert pass → published
The competitive map, continuously redrawn
Teardowns, funding and hiring watches across the category - so consolidation and pivots reach you as briefs the week they happen.
weekly deltas · rotating deep passes
AI-answer share in a technical category
The queries practitioners actually ask - category explainers, comparisons, "how does X work" - tracked and worked with documentation-grade content.
asked → tracked → won
Pipeline from security-relevant signals
Hiring for the roles that feel your problem, breach-driven budget shifts, compliance-deadline pressure - the signals that mean now, worked with verified contacts.
signals → verified → routed
⟨ MISSIONS YOU WOULD RUN ⟩
Described in plain language. Delivered end to end.
AI VISIBILITY
Product docs as answer bait
Documentation restructured for how assistants lift answers - because in security, the docs are the content practitioners trust.
AI VisibilitySite AuditGitHub
ONE MISSION · EVIDENCE ATTACHED
PIPELINE
Job-posting triggers → CRM
Companies hiring for the roles your product exists to relieve, enriched and verified into your CRM with the posting quoted.
Hiring DataFirmographicsEmail FinderAttio
ONE MISSION · EVIDENCE ATTACHED
Three of a hundred. The full playbook library ships in every workspace, and anything you can describe becomes a mission.
⟨ GOVERNED AUTONOMY ⟩
Safe enough to actually turn on.
⟨ CONTROL PLANE ⟩ENFORCED AT RUNTIME · NOT ADVISORY
Technical claims route to technical reviewers
The approval queue can route by content type - product claims to product, threat claims to research - before anything ships.
The brand kit bans the words your buyers hate
"Military-grade", "unhackable", the superlatives that end credibility - encoded once, blocked in every draft.
Everything outward is gated
Publishing, sending and spending wait for named approval. Research flows freely; your name waits for you.
Questions, answered.
Marketing for security buyers is trust-sensitive - how does this help?
Security buyers punish hype, so everything ships evidence-first: claims sourced, statistics real, comparisons honest about trade-offs. The agents are structurally better at restraint than a rushed human - the brand kit bans the superlatives and the drafts obey it. Comparison content states trade-offs plainly, which is precisely the register that earns citations from technical evaluators.
Can it track what AI assistants tell buyers about security tools?
Yes - the evaluation questions in your category are sampled across engines on cadence, with citations captured verbatim. When an assistant recommends a rival for a question you should own, the alert arrives with the answer attached and a sourced content plan to contest it.
How does it treat our own operational security?
Connections are scoped OAuth or keys you can revoke per-tool, actions are logged append-only, writes gate behind approvals, and API keys are individually scoped. The governance surface is designed to pass the same review your team runs on any vendor.
⟨ DEPLOY ASTROFABRIC ⟩
Earn the practitioner's trust at scale.
Evidence-first growth for a category that checks receipts.