AI VISIBILITY
Local AI visibility audit
What assistants say when patients ask for your specialty in your area - and the sourced content plan to win those answers.
AI VisibilityWeb ResearchNotion
ONE MISSION · EVIDENCE ATTACHED
⟨ FOR HEALTHCARE AND MEDICAL PRACTICES ⟩
Grow patient trust at machine speed.
Evidence-first content, approval gates on everything public, and visibility into what AI assistants tell patients about you - autonomy built for the industry where accuracy is the brand.
CLAIMS SOURCEDPUBLISHING GATEDANSWERS TRACKED
⟨ THE JOB TODAY ⟩
Where the week actually goes.
01 /
Patients ask AI before they call you
Symptom questions, treatment comparisons, "best near me" - assistants answer them all, citing whoever published credibly. If that is not you, the referral happened before your phone could ring.
02 /
Every public sentence is a liability review
Health claims carry consequences. Content pipelines built on unsourced drafts die in review - so most practices publish nothing and lose to whoever does it properly.
03 /
Reputation lives in places nobody watches
Reviews, community threads and directory listings shape patient choice daily, and checking them all is a job nobody holds.
⟨ PATIENT QUESTIONS ⟩AI ANSWER WATCH · WEEKLY
⟨ WITH ASTROFABRIC ⟩
What changes when agents carry the work.
Sourced patient-facing content
Drafts arrive with citations for every clinical claim, so review starts from documented rather than suspicious. The gate to publish stays with your people.
claim → source · publish gated
AI-answer visibility for patient questions
The questions patients ask assistants about your services and area, tracked weekly - who gets recommended, who gets cited, where you are absent.
tracked weekly → gaps → briefs
Local presence, kept coherent
Listings, reviews and local answers monitored together; inconsistencies and new review themes surface with suggested responses for your approval.
listings · reviews · local answers
⟨ MISSIONS YOU WOULD RUN ⟩
Described in plain language. Delivered end to end.
CONTENT
Condition-page content sprint
The condition and treatment questions with weak answers, written as sourced drafts your clinical reviewer can approve quickly.
Keyword IntelligenceGoogle Docs
ONE MISSION · EVIDENCE ATTACHED
REPORTS & DECKS
Reputation weather report
Reviews and community mentions read monthly into themes, with drafted responses queued for approval.
Web ResearchGamma
ONE MISSION · EVIDENCE ATTACHED
Three of a hundred. The full playbook library ships in every workspace, and anything you can describe becomes a mission.
⟨ GOVERNED AUTONOMY ⟩
Safe enough to actually turn on.
⟨ CONTROL PLANE ⟩ENFORCED AT RUNTIME · NOT ADVISORY
Nothing public without a named approver
Publishing, replies and outreach park in the approval queue by rule. In a practice, that approver is often the clinician - the queue makes their review a two-minute task.
The brand kit encodes your boundaries
Claims never made, language never used, disclaimers always present - set once, enforced in every draft.
A trail that survives scrutiny
Who approved what, backed by which sources, at what time - append-only, readable by anyone who needs to ask.
Questions, answered.
Can clinical review keep up with agent output?
Yes, because review gets easier, not just faster: drafts arrive with every clinical claim sourced, so your reviewer checks citations rather than hunting for them. The approval queue makes sign-off a two-minute task, and nothing publishes without it. Reviewers report the shift plainly: they stopped hunting for problems and started confirming sources.
How does it handle patient privacy?
The marketing missions work on public surfaces - your site, reviews, answer engines, listings - not patient records. Connections are scoped, actions are logged append-only, and the governance model is built to survive exactly the scrutiny healthcare vendors expect. Nothing in the mission layer touches clinical systems, which keeps the governance conversation mercifully short.
What is AI-answer visibility worth to a practice?
Patients increasingly ask assistants which provider to trust before they ever search. Those answers cite whoever published credibly - tracking them shows where you are absent, and the sourced content that wins those citations arrives as drafts your reviewer can approve.
⟨ RELATED READING ⟩
⟨ DEPLOY ASTROFABRIC ⟩
Be the answer patients get.
Sourced, gated, and visible where patients actually ask.