Verified contacts with provenance, suppression enforced at the source, every write approval-gated and an audit trail your compliance team can read. Prospecting, enrichment and audiences built for a regulated category.
Every enriched value carries the source family that filled it and the date, on the row a reviewer reads.
Do-not-contact, jurisdiction and customer exclusions applied before the list exists and again before any push.
Every enrichment, write, push and approval recorded with actor, target, evidence and time; nothing rewritten.
Sequence loads, CRM writes and audience pushes wait for a named approver; research flows without a gate.
Where did this email come from, when was consent checked, is this person on a do-not-contact list. Most data tools answer with a shrug, and compliance stops the campaign.
Licensed lenders, registered advisers, payment institutions in specific jurisdictions. Generic firmographic filters cannot see the line the regulator draws.
Who approved this send? What evidence backed that claim in the opener? Regulators do not accept a screenshot of a spreadsheet.
Every enriched value carries the source family that filled it and the date, so a challenged contact defends itself with its origin.
Do-not-contact records, jurisdiction exclusions and customers held out before a list exists, and checked again before any sequence or audience push.
Companies identified by licence type, jurisdiction, technology and size together, with the classification recorded on the row for review.
Every enrichment, write, push and send lands in a trail the application can add to and read, never rewrite.
Jurisdictions, licence types, restricted claims and do-not-contact sources written into the ICP and brand kit once, applied to every mission.
Companies classified by licence type, jurisdiction, size and technology, with the classification and its source recorded on each row.
Do-not-contact records, jurisdiction exclusions, customers and open deals removed before any person is looked up.
Compliance, operations and finance leads resolved by title, emails found through licensed sources and verified, provenance stored per field.
First touches written with restricted claims enforced, every factual claim checked against its source before staging.
Sequence loads, CRM writes and audience pushes park in the approval queue for compliance, with the chain of evidence attached.
Regulated firms in the markets you serve, classified by licence type and jurisdiction, the compliance or operations lead verified, delivered as a CSV with provenance columns for the reviewer.
The outbound list verified, deduplicated against the CRM and checked against every suppression and jurisdiction rule, with the held-out rows and their reasons listed for the compliance reviewer.
Banks, processors and platforms a target already works with, read from relationships data and news, so the pitch names the integration that matters and skips the ones that conflict.
Licences, funding, stack, leadership and recent enforcement news assembled with sources before the meeting, filed to the deal record for the review that follows it.
| By hand | With AstroFabric | |
|---|---|---|
| Contact origin | A purchased list of unknown provenance | Licensed sources, source family and date on every field |
| Segmentation | Generic firmographic filters | Licence type, jurisdiction, size and stack together |
| Suppression | Checked after the campaign was built | Applied before the list exists, checked again before any push |
| Claims in copy | Caught in review, sometimes | Restricted claims enforced in every draft |
| Approvals | An email thread | A named approver, recorded with the evidence |
| Audit | Screenshots of a spreadsheet | An append-only trail the application cannot rewrite |
Regulated firms in the markets you serve, classified and scored, the compliance or operations lead verified, delivered as a CSV with provenance columns.
The outbound list verified, deduped against the CRM and checked against every suppression list before the compliance reviewer sees it.
The prospect’s licences, funding, stack, leadership and recent news assembled with sources, for the meeting compliance will ask about later.
Three of a hundred. The full playbook library ships in every workspace, and anything you can describe becomes a mission.
Gates route to people. The trail records who approved which send, push or write, against which evidence, at what time.
Language your regulator flags and claims your brand never makes live in the brand kit and are enforced in every draft.
Paid data reserves before it runs and stops at the ceiling by construction; spend surprises are a class of incident you retire.
That is the design center: every field carries its source and date, suppression and consent checks run before a list exists and again before any send, and outward actions wait in an approval queue routed to named reviewers. The audit trail is append-only, so compliance reviews a documented artifact.
Workspaces are tenant-isolated end to end: connections, lists, memory and spend live inside yours alone, with row-level enforcement underneath. Nothing pools across customers, disconnecting a tool revokes access immediately, and every read and write is attributed in the audit log.
Yes. Exclusions by country, state or licence type are written into the ICP and applied as suppression before any list is built, with the classification recorded on each row so a reviewer can see why an account was included or held out.
From licensed sources that publish under their own compliance frameworks, never from scraping member networks. Each email or phone is stored with the source family that supplied it and the date it verified, and your suppression, consent and jurisdiction rules are applied before any lookup runs.
Yes. Approval policies name the person or role for each action type, so sequence loads and audience pushes can require a compliance reviewer while CRM enrichment writes route to RevOps. The queue shows the rows, the evidence and the suppression checks, and the trail records who approved what.
The brand kit holds the language your regulator flags and the claims your brand never makes, and every draft is written under it and checked before staging. Factual claims are tied to their source, so a reviewer can see the funding round or posting an opener references.
Yes. The trail is append-only and readable from the console and the API, filterable by actor, action, record and date, and exportable for a review or an examiner request. Every enrichment, write, push and approval carries its evidence link, so the export stands on its own.
Lists your compliance team can read line by line, starting this week.