Brand mention sweep
Everything said about you across the open web this month, themed and sourced, with the three items worth acting on.
Mentions, reviews, communities and AI answers watched together, with alerts that fire on real movement and briefs that arrive with the evidence attached.
Reviews, forums, social threads - themes form across them in days, and the first the team hears is a prospect quoting one.
What ChatGPT and friends say about your brand is now the intro paragraph of your reputation - and almost nobody watches it.
Keyword alerts fire on everything, so they get muted, so the one that mattered was in the muted pile.
Mentions, reviews, communities and assistant answers read together - because reputation is one thing that lives in many places.
Standing missions diff against history and speak when something actually changed - a theme forming, a citation lost, sentiment bending.
Every alert carries the captures behind it and, where a response makes sense, a draft waiting for approval.
Everything said about you across the open web this month, themed and sourced, with the three items worth acting on.
What AI engines tell people about your brand, tracked weekly with displacement alerts.
The cross-surface reputation report - themes, movement, responses taken - as a deck for leadership.
Three of a hundred. The full playbook library ships in every workspace, and anything you can describe becomes a mission.
Drafts arrive ready; posting waits for a named approver. Reputation moves are decisions, and the queue keeps them that way.
Every capture archives, so this quarter’s themes read against last quarter’s honestly.
Standing watches meter predictably - always-on never becomes always-billing.
Mentions across the open web, review platforms, communities like Reddit, and - the new one - what AI assistants say when people ask about you. Reputation is one thing living in many places; the watch reads them together so themes surface wherever they form.
By firing only on durable movement: standing missions diff against archived history and hold single-sample wobble until it persists. Weeks of silence are the normal, correct output - which is exactly what makes the alert that does arrive worth interrupting for.
The evidence and a move: captured excerpts behind the change, what specifically shifted, and where a response makes sense, a draft waiting for approval. An alert you can act on in five minutes, not a link pile to investigate. Five minutes from alert to action is the design target, and the drafts are why it holds in practice.
Every surface watched, every alert earned, every response yours.