Program answer audit
The enrollment questions in your category, tested across assistants, with the winnable answers ranked.
Program content answering what families and learners actually ask, visibility in the AI answers that now shape enrollment decisions, and follow-up that holds through long decision cycles.
"Is program X worth it", "best course for Y" - AI answers these with citations, and enrollment-shaping comparisons get made before your admissions team knows the person exists.
Weeks or months between first look and enrollment - and human follow-up loses the thread right when the decision window opens.
Outcomes change, curricula update, and the pages that answer "what will I learn" quietly go stale.
The questions families and learners actually search, answered on your pages with the evidence attached - outcomes, structure, comparisons.
What assistants say when people ask about your programs and category, tracked - the new front door of enrollment, watched.
Standing missions hold inquiry follow-up across the whole decision cycle - the right touch at the right stage, every send approval-gated.
The enrollment questions in your category, tested across assistants, with the winnable answers ranked.
Stale program pages found, refreshed against current questions, staged for approval.
A decision-cycle nurture designed from your actual funnel, drafts in voice, sends gated.
Three of a hundred. The full playbook library ships in every workspace, and anything you can describe becomes a mission.
Placement rates, outcomes and pricing claims carry sources, and publication waits for a named approver.
The institution\u2019s voice lives in the brand kit - the nurture email and the program page sound like one school.
Metered missions and hard ceilings mean an enrollment push costs what was planned.
Yes - audiences are personas the missions write for explicitly: the outcomes-focused parent page and the experience-focused student page draft separately, in registers the brand kit defines. The same program truth, told to each reader in their language. Both versions stage side by side for approval, so the messaging stays coordinated rather than merely parallel.
Standing missions hold the thread: stage-matched touches across weeks or months, silence respected where configured, every send gated. The inquiry from March still gets its decision-window email in August - the cadence humans drop is exactly what schedules keep. Every touch logs against the inquiry, so admissions can see the whole journey when the application finally arrives.
Only sourced ones: placement rates, salaries and results carry citations to your verified data, and the brand kit bans what you cannot substantiate. Accuracy in outcomes claims is enforced at draft time, which protects the institution before review even starts.
Enrollment questions, answered and held to decision.