Hiring-trigger first touches
For the companies that just posted the relevant roles, a first touch to each VP naming the posting and one company-specific insight, created as Gmail drafts for review.
Every message grounded in what actually changed at the account this week: the posting, the round, the technology switch, the new hire. Agents read the evidence per row, write in your voice, and stage the drafts where you send from.
Hiring, funding, technology change, news and intent for the account; role, tenure and moves for the person.
Every personalization claim verified against the signal it cites before the draft is staged.
Register, banned phrases and proof points set once and injected into everything written in your name.
Drafts wait in the tool you send from until you approve.
First name, company name, a line about the industry. Buyers can tell homework from merge fields, and reply rates say so.
Reading the news, the postings, the profile, then writing something specific. At forty accounts a day it is the first thing cut.
Referencing a round that closed two years ago, or a role the person left. Personalization at scale fails loudly when the facts are stale.
Hiring, funding, technology change, news and intent for the account; role, tenure and recent moves for the person, read before drafting.
Openers, sequences, subject lines, call notes and LinkedIn messages under your brand kit and approved proof points.
When the list splits by industry, stack or signal, each segment gets its own angle and every draft inherits it.
Drafts land in Gmail, Instantly, Lemlist or the CRM as paused sequences and draft messages, with the evidence attached to each.
A list, a CRM segment, the call sheet or a single domain, with the titles and the channel the drafts are for.
Hiring by team, funding, technology adoption or change, news and intent read for each company, with the freshest fact ranked first.
Title, tenure, recent moves and, where you connect LinkedIn, public activity, so the draft speaks to the role and the moment.
Every claim tied to its source and date; stale rounds, departed people and closed roles flagged and excluded from the draft.
Openers, sequences, subject lines, call notes and LinkedIn messages written in your register with approved proof points.
Drafts created in Gmail, loaded paused into Instantly or Lemlist, or attached to CRM records, each with its evidence.
For the companies that just posted the relevant roles, a first touch to each VP naming the posting and one company-specific insight, created as Gmail drafts for review.
Two-line openers and three talking points for every account on tomorrow’s call sheet, written into the sheet beside the verified phone.
For fifteen target accounts, each champion’s recent public posts summarized and a comment-then-connect-then-message plan drafted for the rep to run by hand.
For customers approaching renewal, what changed at the account this quarter, the new leaders and the teams that grew, written into a note for the account manager.
| By hand | With AstroFabric | |
|---|---|---|
| Depth | First name, company, industry line | The posting, the round, the switch, the new hire |
| Cost per account | An afternoon of reading | Seconds of agent time, evidence attached |
| Accuracy | A round from two years ago | Every claim checked against its source and date |
| Voice | Whoever wrote the template | Your brand kit, your corrections remembered |
| Channels | Email only | Email, call notes and LinkedIn plans from one read |
| Control | Sent on upload | Staged as drafts, sent by a person |
For the companies that just posted the relevant roles, a first touch to each VP naming the posting and one company-specific insight.
Two-line openers and three talking points for every account on the call sheet, written into the Sheet beside the phone.
For fifteen target accounts, each champion’s recent posts summarized and a comment-then-connect-then-message plan per person.
Three of a hundred. The full playbook library ships in every workspace, and anything you can describe becomes a mission.
Every personalization claim is verified against the signal it cites before the draft is staged; stale facts are flagged, never sent.
Voice, banned claims and approved proof points, set once, injected into everything written in your name.
Drafts wait in the tool you send from until you approve; nothing reaches a prospect on an agent’s judgment alone.
For the account: hiring by team, funding rounds, technology adoption or change, news and intent on your topics. For the person: title, tenure, recent moves and, where you connect LinkedIn, public activity. Each draft names the specific fact it was written from and links to the source.
The brand kit holds your register, banned phrases and proof points, and every draft is written under it. Edit a draft and the correction persists in workspace memory, so after a few rounds the drafts arrive sounding like your best writer on a good day.
Yes. Call notes, two-line openers and talking points per account are written into the call sheet beside the verified phone, and LinkedIn connection notes and comment-then-connect plans are drafted for the rep to send by hand. Every note names the fact it was written from.
The draft falls back to the strongest durable fact on the record, the stack, the segment or a public proof point, and says so in the evidence note, so a rep can decide whether to send or wait. Quiet accounts can be held in a watch and drafted when a signal lands.
Yes. A list of several hundred rows is read, segmented by stack, industry or signal, given one angle per segment and drafted row by row with the specific fact for each. The summary reports how many drafts cite a fresh signal and how many rely on durable facts.
Yes. Drafts can be written in the language you name per segment or per row, with the brand kit’s register and proof points carried across. Evidence is read from sources in any language the licensed data covers, and the citation stays attached whichever language the draft uses.
Plans start at $65 per month with credits included. Reading signals for an account costs a few credits, person enrichment a few more, and drafting itself is included, so a batch of forty first touches costs what the evidence behind them resolves. Estimates show before every run.
The first forty drafts, each naming what changed, before the next call block.